The cases for 2026-09-28
Three deduction cases: Easy, Medium, Hard. Each has exactly one solution, reachable by logic alone. No guessing, ever. Solve any one to keep your streak.
Play these cases →Case Nº 2026-09-28 is free to play for its first 7 days. After that it moves to the Pro vault, and Pro opens it here or in the app.
Cut! on Stage Nine — the Marsh file
EASY · 11 cluesThe reel of the final scene vanished from the lot the night the picture wrapped. Each member of the crew waited out the search on a different soundstage down the backlot row. Trace the row, stage by stage, and find who took it. Statements were taken from all 4 crew members; Ruby Marsh's is the first page.
- 1. Dolores Vane and the crew member holding the wax candle are the same person.
- 2. Faye Okonkwo was in the soundstage right before the crew member holding the wax candle.
- 3. The crew member holding the script binder was in the soundstage right before the crew member holding the wax candle.
- 4. Dolores Vane and the camera operator are the same person.
- 5. Ruby Marsh and the dialect coach had exactly 2 soundstages between them.
- 6. Otto Lindqvist and the film loader had exactly 1 soundstage between them.
- 7. The costume cutter was in the soundstage right before the crew member holding the script binder.
- 8. The costume cutter was in a lower-numbered soundstage than the dialect coach.
- 9. Dolores Vane was in the soundstage right before the crew member holding the reel canister.
- 10. Ruby Marsh and the crew member holding the fake telegram are the same person.
- 11. The costume cutter was right next to the crew member holding the script binder.
A Bad Night at the Velvet Canary — the Trent file
MEDIUM · 15 cluesThe night the band played its last set, a book of marked bills disappeared from behind the bar. Every regular sat with a drink in a different booth running the length of the wall. Reconstruct the row, booth by booth. Statements were taken from all 5 regulars; Marcus Trent's is the first page.
- 1. Hazel Quartermain and the regular flashing the platinum pocket watch are the same person.
- 2. Hazel Quartermain was right next to the regular drinking the bathtub gin.
- 3. The regular drinking the bathtub gin was right next to the regular flashing the platinum pocket watch.
- 4. Inez Montoya was somewhere after Marcus Trent but before Ruby Calhoun.
- 5. Otis Brennan and the regular flashing the emerald ring are the same person.
- 6. The regular drinking the bee's knees was in a lower-numbered booth than the regular flashing the emerald ring.
- 7. Inez Montoya was in the booth right before the regular flashing the platinum pocket watch.
- 8. The regular flashing the engraved lighter was in the booth right before the regular flashing the emerald ring.
- 9. Otis Brennan and the regular drinking the brandy alexander are the same person.
- 10. The regular drinking the gin rickey was right next to the regular flashing the ruby stickpin.
- 11. The regular drinking the mint julep and the regular flashing the gold cigarette case are the same person.
- 12. The regular drinking the gin rickey was in the booth right before the regular flashing the engraved lighter.
- 13. Marcus Trent was right next to the regular flashing the ruby stickpin.
- 14. The regular drinking the bathtub gin was in the booth right before the regular flashing the platinum pocket watch.
- 15. Marcus Trent and the regular flashing the emerald ring had exactly 3 booths between them.
Checkout at the Hotel Meridian — the Brandt file
HARD · 16 cluesEvery guest on the top floor signed the book under a name that is not theirs. The bell captain kept his own count — suites, keys, and lies, front to back. Reconcile the corridor. 5 guests, 5 suites, and no two accounts that quite agree — start with Nathaniel Brandt.
- 1. Nathaniel Brandt was in the suite right before the guest pretending to be the perfumer.
- 2. The guest carrying the silver key tag was in the suite right before the guest carrying the pewter key tag.
- 3. Philippa Drake was in the suite right before the guest carrying the crystal key tag.
- 4. Whoever ordered the fruit compote was in the suite right before whoever ordered the croissants.
- 5. The guest pretending to be the perfumer was right next to whoever ordered the coddled eggs.
- 6. The guest pretending to be the antique dealer was in a lower-numbered suite than whoever ordered the brioche.
- 7. Rosalind Carver was in a lower-numbered suite than whoever ordered the grilled tomatoes.
- 8. Whoever ordered the croissants was in the suite right before whoever ordered the brioche.
- 9. The guest carrying the ebony key tag and whoever ordered the brioche are the same person.
- 10. The guest pretending to be the film producer was somewhere after the guest pretending to be the antique dealer but before the guest pretending to be the retired colonel.
- 11. Rosalind Carver was in the suite right before whoever ordered the coddled eggs.
- 12. The guest pretending to be the art dealer was right next to the guest carrying the ebony key tag.
- 13. Julius Renard was in the suite right before Rosalind Carver.
- 14. The guest pretending to be the perfumer and whoever ordered the grilled tomatoes are the same person.
- 15. Julius Renard was in a lower-numbered suite than the guest pretending to be the retired colonel.
- 16. The guest pretending to be the film producer and the guest carrying the ivory key tag had exactly 1 suite between them.
Every Verdict case has exactly one solution, provably reachable by deduction alone, no guessing required. Can you close all three?